Member-only story

War in Social Thought: From Hobbes to the Present

Cody Russell

·5.9k Followers· Follow

Published in War In Social Thought: Hobbes To The Present

6 min read

527 View Claps

78 Respond

Save

Listen

War is a complex and multifaceted phenomenon that has been studied by philosophers and social scientists for centuries. There is no single definition of war, but it is generally understood to be a violent conflict between two or more organized groups of people. War can be fought for a variety of reasons, including territorial conquest, economic gain, or ideological differences.

War in Social Thought: Hobbes to the Present

by Hans Joas

4 out of 5

Language	:	English
File size	:	632 KB
Text-to-Speech	:	Enabled
Enhanced typesetting	:	Enabled
Word Wise	:	Enabled
Print length	:	329 pages
Screen Reader	:	Supported

The history of war is long and bloody. According to the Uppsala Conflict Data Program, there have been over 500 major wars since the year 1400. These wars have resulted in the deaths of millions of people and have had a devastating impact on societies around the world.

In this article, we will explore the history of war in social thought. We will examine the different ways that philosophers and social scientists have understood war, its causes, and its consequences. We will also discuss the ways in which war has been represented in literature and art.

Hobbes and the State of Nature

One of the most influential thinkers to write about war was Thomas Hobbes. In his book Leviathan, Hobbes argued that war is a natural state of human beings. He believed that humans are inherently selfish and competitive, and that they are always at war with each other for resources and power.

Hobbes's view of war was pessimistic. He believed that there was no way to escape the state of nature and that war would always be a part of human life. However, he also argued that it was possible to create a state that would protect its citizens from the violence of the state of nature. This state would have a monopoly on violence and would be able to enforce peace and order.

Kant and Perpetual Peace

Immanuel Kant was another influential philosopher who wrote about war. In his essay Perpetual Peace, Kant argued that war is not a natural state of human beings. He believed that humans are capable of reason and morality, and that they can choose to live in peace.

Kant proposed a number of ways to achieve perpetual peace. First, he argued that all nations should adopt a republican form of government. He believed that republics are more likely to be peaceful than monarchies or dictatorships. Second, he argued that all nations should agree to a treaty that would ban war. Finally, he argued that all nations should create a world federation that would enforce the treaty and prevent war.

Clausewitz and the Nature of War

Carl von Clausewitz was a Prussian general and military theorist who wrote extensively about war. In his book On War, Clausewitz argued that war is a complex and unpredictable phenomenon. He believed that there is no such thing as a "just war" and that all wars are essentially political.

Clausewitz also argued that war is a test of wills. He believed that the side that is most determined to win will ultimately prevail. This view of war is often referred to as the "will to power."

Foucault and the Discourse of War

Michel Foucault was a French philosopher and historian who wrote extensively about power and knowledge. In his book The History of Sexuality, Foucault argued that war is not a natural phenomenon but rather a product of discourse. He believed that the way that we talk about war shapes the way that we think about it and the way that we fight it.

Foucault also argued that war is a powerful tool for social control. He believed that governments use war to control their citizens and to maintain their power. This view of war is often referred to as the "discourse of war."

Deleuze and Guattari and the War Machine

Gilles Deleuze and Félix Guattari were two French philosophers who wrote extensively about war. In their book A Thousand Plateaus, Deleuze and Guattari argued that war is not a natural phenomenon but rather a product of capitalism. They believed that capitalism is a system that is based on violence and domination, and that war is a way to maintain this system.

Deleuze and Guattari also argued that war is a form of social control. They believed that governments use war to control their citizens and to maintain their power. This view of war is often referred to as the "war machine."

War is a complex and multifaceted phenomenon that has been studied by philosophers and social scientists for centuries. The history of war is long and bloody, and war has had a devastating impact on societies around the world.

In this article, we have explored the history of war in social thought. We have examined the different ways that philosophers and social scientists have understood war, its causes, and its consequences. We have also discussed the ways in which war has been represented in literature and art.

The study of war is important because it can help us to understand the causes of war and to develop ways to prevent it. It can also help us to understand the impact of war on individuals and societies, and to develop ways to heal the wounds of war.

War in Social Thought: Hobbes to the Present

by Hans Joas

4 out of 5